The first…

Racism is alive and well in Vancouver municipal politics

By Charlie Smith

Why is it that a candidate of South Asian descent always attracts fewer votes in Vancouver municipal elections than other members of his or her party?

The only possible explanation is racism when it happens again and again and again.

Yesterday, Vision Vancouver’s only council candidate of South Asian descent, Kashmir Dhaliwal, came 11th.

The next worst performance by a Vision candidate was Geoff Meggs’s ninth-place showing, almost 5,000 votes higher than the number of ballots for Dhaliwal, the well-regarded president of the Khalsa Diwan Society.

Vision’s only park-board candidate of South Asian descent, Raj Hundal, was elected, but he came more than 6,000 votes behind the next lowest Vision candidate, Sarah Blyth.

Hundal is extremely well-educated and worked as a political aide to former NDP MP Penny Priddy. In other words, he’s no slouch at politics.

COPE’s only school-board candidate of South Asian descent, Alvin Singh, came 2,227 votes behind the next lowest COPE school-board candidate, Bill Bargeman.

Singh, a brilliant young politician, has been referred to as the “South Asian Spencer Herbert” inside the Straight newsroom because he’s such an articulate dynamo. But apparently, that wasn’t good enough for the voters.

What I’m trying to say is that Dhaliwal, Hundal, and Singh were all very credible candidates, and they all came last on their respective slates.

The only explanation is that thousands of voters who otherwise voted for the Vision-COPE slate chose not to include one or all of them because their last names didn’t correspond with their “vision” of who should be serving on council, the park board, and school board.

It doesn’t stop there. The NPA’s only council candidate of South Asian descent, Daljit Singh Sidhu, was last among NPA candidates, 4,516 votes behind the next lowest NPA council candidate, Sean Bickerton.

For Sidhu, long-time president of the Punjabi Market Association, it was a case of deja vu. He came last on the NPA slate in 1993. Like Dhaliwal this year, he was the only member of his team not to get elected to council that year.

This year, the NPA’s only park-board candidate of South Asian descent, Naresh Shukla, came last among NPA candidates—5,779 votes behind the next-lowest NPA park commissioner, Sharon Urton.

Face it: Urton and Shukla are not well-known, so the only explanation for such a large discrepancy is racism, particularly when people look at the broader pattern.

There was a similar story at the school-board level. The NPA’s only candidate of South Asian descent, Lakhbir Singh, trailed the next-lowest ranking NPA candidate, Margit Nance, by 1,355 votes.

In 2004, I wrote a cover story about the debate over wards called “Shred the System“. I researched the history of candidates with South Asian descent in recent Vancouver municipal elections.

Here’s how the 2004 story began:

The past five Vancouver civic elections have been a disaster for Indo-Canadian municipal politicians.

The trouble began in 1990, when the only South Asian incumbent, NPA school trustee Harkirpal Sara, was defeated in his bid for a third term on the Vancouver school board.

For the Indo-Canadian community, it has been downhill ever since.

In the 1993 election, the NPA enjoyed spectacular success, capturing nine of the 10 council seats.

However, the only Indo-Canadian NPA council candidate, Daljit Sidhu, suffered a devastating loss. Sidhu, president of the Original Punjabi Market Association, finished almost 10,000 votes behind his closest NPA Caucasian competitor, Craig Hemer.

The same year, Kewal Pabla, a businessman and the only NPA Indo-Canadian park board candidate, trailed his nearest Caucasian NPA competitor by 4,000 votes.

The NPA’s only Indo-Canadian school board candidate, lawyer Iqbal Sara, came in a disappointing 15th place. For the second consecutive time, Vancouver voters had rejected every candidate of South Asian descent.

In 1996, the big political story was the NPA’s unprecedented sweep of the park board, school board, city council, and the mayoral race. This time, the governing party didn’t run any Indo-Canadians, but COPE did.

The three COPE candidates with South Asian surnames–Nina Khajuria, Kamla R. Raj, and Raj Sihota–each came in last on their slates for council, school board, and park board, respectively.

In 1999, the phenomenon struck a fourth time. The NPA won eight of 10 council seats. However, the ruling party’s only Indo-Canadian council candidate, real-estate agent Baldev Dhugga, didn’t come close.

He trailed the second-lowest-ranking NPA candidate, Janet Leduc, by more than 3,000 votes.

The same year, the NPA’s only candidate of South Asian descent for school board, Vijay Singhera, finished almost 4,000 votes behind her closest NPA Caucasian competitor, incumbent trustee John Robertson.

The NPA didn’t run an Indo-Canadian for park board, but COPE did. Munna Prasad, a South Asian, finished last among the COPE candidates.

In 2002, neither COPE nor the NPA nominated a single candidate of South Asian descent for any of the 26 elected positions on council, school board, and park board.

A similar situation has unfolded in Surrey, the region’s second-largest city. In 1993, all the nonwhite candidates went down to defeat.

In 1999, the well-regarded Sukh Dhaliwal ran for the powerful Surrey Electors Team machine headed by Mayor Doug McCallum. Dhaliwal’s campaign manager was a crack political organizer named Kevin Falcon, now B.C.’s Minister of Transportation. Even with these connections, Dhaliwal lost.

Surrey has never had an Indo-Canadian municipal councillor, even though 20 percent of that city’s population is South Asian, according to the last census. (editor’s note: this piece was written in 2004 before Tom Gill’s election in 2005.)

One of the most glaring percentage differentials occurred in Burnaby in 1999. The second-lowest ranking Burnaby NPA council candidate collected 50 percent more votes than the only Indo-Canadian member of the slate, SFU political scientist Shinder Purewal. Not one of the above-mentioned candidates has ever run since in a municipal election.

The message that these results have sent out to every person of South Asian descent is that municipal politics is a waste of time. Why bother volunteering your time, money, and skills to try to seek political office in Vancouver if you’re just going to get slapped down every time you run?

If you can’t get elected municipally, that reduces your chance of graduating to the provincial and federal levels. In this respect, the at-large system metes out a double whammy of discriminatory treatment to aspiring politicians of South Asian descent.

The last time COPE controlled council, there was a chance to fix this and get a plebiscite passed supporting a ward system.

COPE and the labour movement put in a half-assed attempt. Dhaliwal paid the price in this election.

The COPE-Vision slate should revisit this issue. Because if they don’t, some smart lawyer will launch a Charter challenge against the Vancouver Charter, arguing that the at-large election system violates equality rights guaranteed under Section 15.

Vision’s Dhaliwal was a victim of systemic racism in yesterday’s election. And his and other examples listed above should be part of the evidence in such a court challenge against Vancouver’s at-large voting system.

In my layperson’s opinion, there’s not a hope that the at-large would stand up to legal scrutiny. It can’t be saved by Section one of the Charter. And those who don’t do anything about it while they are in office will eventually be blamed for allowing this blatant discrimination to continue unchecked.

This week, people of South Asian descent in Vancouver are commemorating the 100th anniversary of the racist continuous-journey legislation, which kept people from the Indian subcontinent out of Canada. A century later, we have legislation in place that keeps people of South Asian descent out of the Vancouver council chamber.

Get on with it folks. Fix the system. Because if you don’t, you’re going to get hammered in the law courts and in the court of public opinion. This week is when the rubber should hit the road.

link

And the second…

Municipal candidate Kashmir Dhaliwal says at-large system discriminates

By Matthew Burrows

Vision Vancouver’s only unsuccessful election candidate is considering legal action against the City of Vancouver because, he says, the at-large voting system discriminates against candidates with South Asian names. All six candidates from this community came last on their respective slates in the November 15 election. Kashmir Dhaliwal, Vision’s sole South Asian council candidate, placed 11th in his bid for a city-council slot.

“From the core of my heart, I want a ward system,” Dhaliwal told the Georgia Straight by phone. “I have to discuss with my friends what we should do, and those within my community, and if they all give me the green light, then I will take legal action.”

Dhaliwal garnered 44,854 votes—1,023 votes behind COPE councillor-elect Ellen Woodsworth (45,877). Incoming park commissioner Raj Hundal, Vision’s only elected official of South Asian descent, came 7,904 votes behind the next-closest Vision candidate for park board.

Dhaliwal, president of the Khalsa Diwan Society, has support from failed Non-Partisan Association park-board candidate Naresh Shukla, who placed 14th (with 27,350 votes) vying for a position on a board comprising seven commissioners. Shukla, the NPA’s only park-board candidate of South Asian descent, came last among NPA candidates—5,779 votes behind the next-lowest NPA park-board candidate, Sharon Urton.

“Regarding a legal challenge, I don’t know, but I have always advocated a ward system,” Shukla told the Straight by phone. “There is something wrong there with the system. Last time in 1993, [original Punjabi Market Association president] Daljit Sidhu was a candidate with the NPA, and he was the only one who lost that time. Now with Kashmir, well, everybody else got 58,000 or 60,000 votes, except for Kashmir.”

Dhaliwal was almost 5,000 votes behind Vision councillor-elect Geoff Meggs, who garnered 49,538 votes in ninth place. (Meggs placed ahead of Woodsworth but well behind Vision’s top six councillors, who were all within the vote bracket Shukla described.)

Councillors are currently elected on a citywide basis from a large alphabetical list of candidates, rather than on a geographic basis, as would be the case with a ward system. Lawyer Jason Gratl told the Straight by phone that even in the event the “results of a vote are racist”, that does not warrant a challenge of the Vancouver Charter. However, he added: “If the entire election system is racist or sexist or homophobic, the system itself is subject to judicial review.”

He said this extends “in theory” to Vancouver’s at-large system.

“But in practice, a petitioner would have to demonstrate that the at-large system promotes racist results, either deliberately or accidentally,” said Gratl, former president of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association. “Is the candidate’s nonelection a consequence of nonracist voter preferences, racist voter preferences, or a system that empowers racial/racist preferences? Only in the latter case would a charter violation be found.”

COPE’s only school-board candidate of South Asian descent, 24-year-old Alvin Singh, came 2,227 votes behind the next-lowest COPE school-board candidate, Bill Bargeman, well outside the ninth spot on the board. Speaking to the Straight by phone, Singh said he is an opponent of the at-large system for “many reasons”.

However, he said, he is urging a nuanced and “careful” response when discussing a move to a ward system “if race is the motivation alone”.

“The only danger I foresee is a ghettoization of the political process, where you have South Asian people running in South Asian areas, because it’s the only place they can be successful,” Singh said.

In an earlier interview regarding Dhaliwal’s exclusion, Singh said: “I’m not going to be able to say whether or not there should be a legal challenge mounted.…I think there is a segment of the Punjabi community that is extraordinarily motivated. I think what we have also seen is some frustration about municipal politics, and a lot of the South Asian community has moved on to provincial and federal politics.”

link

So the results are in, and election night was a very good night for Vancouver! COPE and Vision won resounding victories at all levels and we finally have leadership that understands the urgent challenges we face as a community. Unfortunately, I will not be a part of the School Board, but we came pretty close.

Luckily though, we have a great team in place and elected three amazing COPE trustees who will be joined by four amazing Vision trustees as well.

I want to thank everyone who supported my campaign. From people all over the world who donated their money to local friends who donated their time. It is incredibly humbling to be reminded so strongly of the amazing people in your life. And you are all indeed such amazing people.

While I won’t be at the Board as a trustee, and while there is no more campaign, the challenges of our city are still great. A lot has been said the past few weeks and months and it is vital that promises become actions. I will be doing my best to make sure our city heads in the right direction, and I urge as many here in Vancouver to do the same.

Democracy doesn’t end when the ballots are counted. There’s a lot left to do. Let’s all help build the city we want to live in.

From the bottom of my heart, thank you.

-Alvin

In about 12 hours, Vancouver will have a new Mayor, Council, Parks Board, and School Board. And right now, as polls open on election day Vancouver has two choices. Voting for a Mayor that has an identical voting record as Sam Sullivan; a mayor who said in his first 30 days he would take a vacation because he saw nothing “burning” to take care of in Vancouver. Vancouver can choose to vote for a Council who sees fit to turn a blind eye to homelessness and slumlords even though they have the laws and properties to solve the problem today. Vancouver can choose a Parks board that doesn’t believe in ethical purchasing, or thought putting giant robotic dinosaurs in parks was a good move. And Vancouver can vote for a School Board that refuses to defend public education, refuses to meet with students and parents, and refuses to work in good faith with teachers, engineers, and other staff.

Or, in a few moments Vancouver can choose the other option. Voting for a Mayor that understands the environment and the creativity we can all bring to solving this city’s great challenges. A Council that leads and understands that no one in Vancouver is disposable. A Parks board that fights to protect our microecosystems across this city and makes sure our parks are protected for generations. And finally, Vancouver can vote for a School Board that is open, accountable, and puts students first.

Today, you choose. Get out there and vote, and hopefully when 8pm rolls around we will have a positive, dynamic, and just Vancouver to look forward to.

From the Straight:

School boards don’t have a lot of power these days. The curriculum, school taxes, teachers’ contracts, and the major portion of the operating grant are determined at the provincial level. The B.C. Liberal government has a tendency to impose contracts on support staff. That leaves school trustees in charge of hiring senior staff, shuffling money around to deal with the fallout of provincial policies, liaising with parent advisory committees, coping with demand for English-as-a-second-language programs, and pushing for seismic upgrades to keep children safe.

In our opinion, the best suited to do this in Vancouver are COPE’s Jane Bouey, Allan Wong, Alvin Singh, and Al Blakey; Vision’s Patti Bacchus, Ken Clement (the first aboriginal candidate who might be elected in Vancouver), and Mike Lombardi; and the NPA’s Ken Denike. Incumbent Vision trustee Sharon Gregson sets a bad example for kids by promoting gun ownership. But if you want someone knowledgeable about all-day kindergarten, special-needs programs, and who can also relate to freaky and marginalized parents, you might want to save a vote for her.

The second is of COPE’s transit policy roll out, you can hear me talk about the importance of transit to our city:

PS: Just 5 more days…tell everyone you know to get out there and VOTE!

I had the pleasure of gathering with friends and colleagues from Vision Vancouver, the Civic Greens, and of course COPE, in the middle of downtown, near West Hastings. We all sat in amazement at the sight of 70,000 people gathered in Chicago to see the next President, to hear him speak, and to see for themselves that amazing things can happen when you believe. But as much as the world has been fixated on this moment for nearly two years now, and as important as the leader of the United States is for this world, the impact of the decisions that Barack Obama will make as the leader of his nation will never come close to the impact our decisions make here in our city – in our small corner of the world.

As much as the US Presidential Election process has been made out to be a critical moment for our entire world, the leadership of our City Hall, our School Board, and our Parks Board is so much more important to our everyday lives. As I left the party and walked out of downtown I passed people who had to sleep on sidewalks, or in doorways, and even one man who had been walking for three hours around downtown because he had nothing else to do – nowhere else to go. There was no hope tonight for these men and women, nothing that the new President of the USA could say to house them, or feed them, or make sure they were safe. As far as any of Vancouver’s nearly 3,000 homeless individuals knew, tonight was the same as any other night. And at the end of the day, no matter how excited many of us are about the US Election results, it’s true. In Vancouver, tonight was just another night.

It was just another night for the thousands of children that go to bed hungry, and then wake up and have to go to school without a good breakfast. It was just another night for the 10,000 people on the waiting list for subsidized housing. It was just another night for the students and workers that have to get up two or three hours early because there aren’t enough buses to get them to school or work on time.

These are local challenges, and they touch us everyday. We need to see the same change that millions of Americans voted for today happen in Vancouver. We need a city hall that stops talking about homelessness and begins to do something about it. We need a parks board that understands sustainability is key to the livability of the entire region. We need a school board that understands the importance of students having a say in the system that shapes them every day. Vancouver needs a city with new direction, leadership that does away with the mentality of the past three years. A mentality that believed Vancouver would accept the status-quo. A Vancouver that didn’t need to consult past the wealthy and privileged. This city needs leadership that eats, lives, and breathes the belief that we can come together as citizens and create a Vancouver for everyone.

Barack Obama mentioned this grassroots hunger for change in his speech tonight when he said that his campaign had “grew strength from the young people who rejected the myth of their generation’s apathy.” We can be those young people for our city. We need to come together, now with just 10 days to go, and demand a better Vancouver. A Vancouver that is just, and compassionate, and a leader on the issues we all believe to be too important to wait on.

So tonight I am asking you all to commit to something small, but at the same time something so incredibly big. Promise to yourself that you will do everything you can to change this city. Promise to yourself that you will vote on November 15th. Promise to yourself that you will tell your friends and family to join you.

Incredible, once in a lifetime moments do not happen because we simply wish them to happen. They do not happen because we hope, or because we let someone else do it for us. Incredible moments, incredible things happen because we demand that they happen. So if you can spare even a few hours on election day, join me. Ask me how you can help us win this city back. How you can make calls or knock on doors.

I need your help on election day. It’s one day; a few hours of your time. But they could change your life in a meaningful way. We don’t have to hope for the change we wish to see; we don’t have to wait for others to act instead. Get out there and make it happen on election day. Please, ask me how.

The article covers the unfortunate reality that parents are being forced to pay more and more for their children’s education. Here are the quotes from the sidebar with myself, Patti Bacchus from Vision, Heather Holden from the NPA, and independant candidate Robert Stark:

Me: “There absolutely has to be a lobby component to it. The last three years, we haven’t seen the board advocating for students. There’s been less and less money and, yes, part of it is [declining] enrollment. But education spending as a percentage of the GDP has gone down every year.”

Heather Holden: “The number-one job of trustees is setting policy. Number two: managing the budget through tough internal decisions. Number three: challenging the province aggressively for our budget needs. No trustee is ever going to say, ‘Oh yeah, we’ve got enough money.’ ”

Patti Bacchus: “The role is in leadership and standing up for the community they’re elected to represent. It’s the same as when we expect the province to make our case to Ottawa, or the city to make our case to the province. The other piece is making careful, locally based decisions on how the funding is allocated.”

Robert Stark: “To cut, cut, cut. I think there’s so much waste at the school board, and everyone is just squawking about getting more money. Salaries could be cut. There’s so many wasteful expenditures. If you had an independent business managing the funds, they’d do a much better job than the school board.”

Read the whole thing here.

WHERE CAN I VOTE EARLY?

There are advanced polls on November 5, 8, 10 and 12 from 8 a.m. – 8 p.m. at the following five locations:

• City Hall
• Dunbar Community Centre
• Trout Lake Community Centre
• West End Community Centre
• Sunset Community Centre

Make sure you bring two pieces of identification containing your name and address. One of these pieces of identification must also contain your signature. (Drivers license and hydro bill for example). More info on identification documents can be found here.

WHO CAN VOTE?

ou are allowed to vote in a Vancouver civic election if you are

• a resident elector (ie. you live in Vancouver)
• OR
• a non-resident property elector (ie. you live elsewhere in B.C. but you own property in Vancouver)

You must meet ALL of the following requirements to vote:

1. You must be 18 years of age or older on general voting day (November 15, 2008).
2. You must be a Canadian citizen.
3. You must have been a resident of B.C. for at least six months immediately before you register to vote.
4. You must have
   • been a resident of Vancouver for at least 30 days immediately before you register to vote (for resident electors)

   OR

   • owned a property in Vancouver for at least 30 days immediately before you register to vote (for non-resident property electors).
5. You must not have been disqualified by law from voting.

WHERE DO I GO ON ELECTION DAY?

To easily find out where you can vote on election day if you didn’t get a voter card in the mail, go here.

Happy voting everyone!

Tieleman went on to say, “…to ensure Robertson can deliver on his commitment, he needs a strong Vision Vancouver/Coalition of Progressive Electors/Green Party team at city council, school and park board after the Nov. 15 election.“

http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/Columnists/NewsViewsAttitude/2008/11/04/7297006-sun.html

Pass the link along, we need as many people to read this as possible!

DON’T VOTE FOR DINOSAURS:

VOTE BEARD: